Despite the [silk on the dock board](https://wiki.makerdiary.com/nrf52840-m2-devkit/resources/nrf52840_m2_devkit_hw_diagram_v1_0.pdf), the SDA/SCL pins weren't defined. Though, they were already defined in `mpconfigboard.h`.
Same for RX/TX. It looks like it declared `TXD` and `RXD`, so I didn't want to remove those, but I think it makes sense to have the "standard" pin names, but I moved ithem to illustrate they were all referencing the same pins.
I mimicked the whitespace I saw in the metro_nrf52840_express port.
We're moving towards a co-processor model and a Wiznet library is
already available.
New native APIs will replace these for chips with networking like the
ESP32S2 but they won't be these.
new file: ports/nrf/boards/raytac_mdbt50q-db-40/bootloader/6.0.0/pca10056_bootloader_6.0.0_s140.zip
new file: ports/nrf/boards/raytac_mdbt50q-db-40/mpconfigboard.h
new file: ports/nrf/boards/raytac_mdbt50q-db-40/mpconfigboard.mk
new file: ports/nrf/boards/raytac_mdbt50q-db-40/pins.c
Testing performed: That a card is successfully mounted on Pygamer with
the built in SD card slot
This module is enabled for most FULL_BUILD boards, but is disabled for
samd21 ("M0"), litex, and pca10100 for various reasons.
This enables WDT support for Simmel. Other platforms cannot yet use
WDT because it overflows their flash storage.
Enable CIRCUITPY_WDT support for the nrf target.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
With the WDT changes, building Circuit Python results in the following error:
/opt/gcc-arm-none-eabi-9-2019-q4-major/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.2.1/../../../../arm-none-eabi/bin/ld: section .ARM.exidx LMA [00000000000621c8,00000000000621cf] overlaps section .data LMA [00000000000621c8,0000000000062383]
This is because unwinding data is getting generated, but has nowhere to go.
Re-enable this data in the linker script so it is saved.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
This section immediately follows the .bss section, and is designed to
contain uninitialized variables that should persist across reboots.
The section is placed directly after .bss, under the theory that the
size of Circuit Python's .bss + .data is bigger than the bootloader's
.bss + .data, so there is less likely to be a conflict.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
