tootlab-mastodon/spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts_controller_spec.rb

188 lines
5.5 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

require 'rails_helper'
2016-09-27 10:58:23 -04:00
RSpec.describe Api::V1::AccountsController, type: :controller do
render_views
let(:user) { Fabricate(:user, account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'alice')) }
let(:token) { Fabricate(:accessible_access_token, resource_owner_id: user.id, scopes: 'follow read') }
before do
allow(controller).to receive(:doorkeeper_token) { token }
end
2016-03-19 07:13:47 -04:00
describe 'GET #show' do
it 'returns http success' do
2016-08-17 11:56:23 -04:00
get :show, params: { id: user.account.id }
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
2016-03-19 07:13:47 -04:00
end
2016-03-19 07:13:47 -04:00
describe 'POST #follow' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob', locked: locked)).account }
before do
2016-08-17 11:56:23 -04:00
post :follow, params: { id: other_account.id }
end
context 'with unlocked account' do
let(:locked) { false }
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 09:00:35 -05:00
it 'returns JSON with following=truthy and requested=false' do
json = body_as_json
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 09:00:35 -05:00
expect(json[:following]).to be_truthy
expect(json[:requested]).to be false
end
it 'creates a following relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.following?(other_account)).to be true
end
end
context 'with locked account' do
let(:locked) { true }
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 09:00:35 -05:00
it 'returns JSON with following=false and requested=truthy' do
json = body_as_json
expect(json[:following]).to be false
Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users (#5762) * Allow hiding of reblogs from followed users This adds a new entry to the account menu to allow users to hide future reblogs from a user (and then if they've done that, to show future reblogs instead). This does not remove or add historical reblogs from/to the user's timeline; it only affects new statuses. The API for this operates by sending a "reblogs" key to the follow endpoint. If this is sent when starting a new follow, it will be respected from the beginning of the follow relationship (even if the follow request must be approved by the followee). If this is sent when a follow relationship already exists, it will simply update the existing follow relationship. As with the notification muting, this will now return an object ({reblogs: [true|false]}) or false for each follow relationship when requesting relationship information for an account. This should cause few issues due to an object being truthy in many languages, but some modifications may need to be made in pickier languages. Database changes: adds a show_reblogs column (default true, non-nullable) to the follows and follow_requests tables. Because these are non-nullable, we use the existing MigrationHelpers to perform this change without locking those tables, although the tables are likely to be small anyway. Tests included. See also <https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/212>. * Rubocop fixes * Code review changes * Test fixes This patchset closes #648 and resolves #3271. * Rubocop fix * Revert reblogs defaulting in argument, fix tests It turns out we needed this for the same reason we needed it in muting: if nil gets passed in somehow (most usually by an API client not passing any value), we need to detect and handle it. We could specify a default in the parameter and then also catch nil, but there's no great reason to duplicate the default value.
2017-11-28 09:00:35 -05:00
expect(json[:requested]).to be_truthy
end
it 'creates a follow request relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.requested?(other_account)).to be true
end
end
2016-03-19 07:13:47 -04:00
end
describe 'POST #unfollow' do
2016-09-07 20:40:51 -04:00
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.follow!(other_account)
2016-08-17 11:56:23 -04:00
post :unfollow, params: { id: other_account.id }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'removes the following relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.following?(other_account)).to be false
end
2016-03-19 07:13:47 -04:00
end
2016-10-03 12:17:06 -04:00
describe 'POST #block' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.follow!(other_account)
post :block, params: { id: other_account.id }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'removes the following relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.following?(other_account)).to be false
end
it 'creates a blocking relation' do
expect(user.account.blocking?(other_account)).to be true
end
end
describe 'POST #unblock' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.block!(other_account)
post :unblock, params: { id: other_account.id }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'removes the blocking relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.blocking?(other_account)).to be false
end
end
describe 'POST #mute' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.follow!(other_account)
post :mute, params: {id: other_account.id }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'does not remove the following relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.following?(other_account)).to be true
end
it 'creates a muting relation' do
expect(user.account.muting?(other_account)).to be true
end
Optional notification muting (#5087) * Add a hide_notifications column to mutes * Add muting_notifications? and a notifications argument to mute! * block notifications in notify_service from hard muted accounts * Add specs for how mute! interacts with muting_notifications? * specs testing that hide_notifications in mutes actually hides notifications * Add support for muting notifications in MuteService * API support for muting notifications (and specs) * Less gross passing of notifications flag * Break out a separate mute modal with a hide-notifications checkbox. * Convert profile header mute to use mute modal * Satisfy eslint. * specs for MuteService notifications params * add trailing newlines to files for Pork :) * Put the label for the hide notifications checkbox in a label element. * Add a /api/v1/mutes/details route that just returns the array of mutes. * Define a serializer for /api/v1/mutes/details * Add more specs for the /api/v1/mutes/details endpoint * Expose whether a mute hides notifications in the api/v1/relationships endpoint * Show whether muted users' notifications are muted in account lists * Allow modifying the hide_notifications of a mute with the /api/v1/accounts/:id/mute endpoint * make the hide/unhide notifications buttons work * satisfy eslint * In probably dead code, replace a dispatch of muteAccount that was skipping the modal with launching the mute modal. * fix a missing import * add an explanatory comment to AccountInteractions * Refactor handling of default params for muting to make code cleaner * minor code style fixes oops * Fixed a typo that was breaking the account mute API endpoint * Apply white-space: nowrap to account relationships icons * Fix code style issues * Remove superfluous blank line * Rename /api/v1/mutes/details -> /api/v2/mutes * Don't serialize "account" in MuteSerializer Doing so is somewhat unnecessary since it's always the current user's account. * Fix wrong variable name in api/v2/mutes * Use Toggle in place of checkbox in the mute modal. * Make the Toggle in the mute modal look better * Code style changes in specs and removed an extra space * Code review suggestions from akihikodaki Also fixed a syntax error in tests for AccountInteractions. * Make AddHideNotificationsToMute Concurrent It's not clear how much this will benefit instances in practice, as the number of mutes tends to be pretty small, but this should prevent any blocking migrations nonetheless. * Fix up migration things * Remove /api/v2/mutes
2017-11-14 21:56:41 -05:00
it 'mutes notifications' do
expect(user.account.muting_notifications?(other_account)).to be true
end
end
describe 'POST #mute with notifications set to false' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.follow!(other_account)
post :mute, params: {id: other_account.id, notifications: false }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'does not remove the following relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.following?(other_account)).to be true
end
it 'creates a muting relation' do
expect(user.account.muting?(other_account)).to be true
end
it 'does not mute notifications' do
expect(user.account.muting_notifications?(other_account)).to be false
end
end
describe 'POST #unmute' do
let(:other_account) { Fabricate(:user, email: 'bob@example.com', account: Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob')).account }
before do
user.account.mute!(other_account)
post :unmute, params: { id: other_account.id }
end
it 'returns http success' do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it 'removes the muting relation between user and target user' do
expect(user.account.muting?(other_account)).to be false
end
end
end