039887a0ac
Undefined behavior in C, needs explicit check.
65 lines
1.2 KiB
Python
65 lines
1.2 KiB
Python
# This tests small int range for 32-bit machine
|
|
|
|
# Small ints are variable-length encoded in MicroPython, so first
|
|
# test that encoding works as expected.
|
|
|
|
print(0)
|
|
print(1)
|
|
print(-1)
|
|
# Value is split in 7-bit "subwords", and taking into account that all
|
|
# ints in Python are signed, there're 6 bits of magnitude. So, around 2^6
|
|
# there's "turning point"
|
|
print(63)
|
|
print(64)
|
|
print(65)
|
|
print(-63)
|
|
print(-64)
|
|
print(-65)
|
|
# Maximum values of small ints on 32-bit platform
|
|
print(1073741823)
|
|
# Per python semantics, lexical integer is without a sign (i.e. positive)
|
|
# and '-' is unary minus operation applied to it. That's why -1073741824
|
|
# (min two-complement's negative value) is not allowed.
|
|
print(-1073741823)
|
|
|
|
# Operations tests
|
|
|
|
a = 0x3fffff
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a *= 0x10
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a *= 0x10
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a += 0xff
|
|
print(a)
|
|
# This would overflow
|
|
#a += 1
|
|
|
|
a = -0x3fffff
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a *= 0x10
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a *= 0x10
|
|
print(a)
|
|
a -= 0xff
|
|
print(a)
|
|
# This still doesn't overflow
|
|
a -= 1
|
|
print(a)
|
|
# This would overflow
|
|
#a -= 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Shifts to big amounts are undefined behavior in C and is CPU-specific
|
|
|
|
# These are compile-time constexprs
|
|
print(1 >> 32)
|
|
print(1 >> 64)
|
|
print(1 >> 128)
|
|
|
|
# These are runtime calcs
|
|
a = 1
|
|
print(a >> 32)
|
|
print(a >> 64)
|
|
print(a >> 128)
|