djsundog
/
circuitpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

uasyncio: fix definition of ticks again 

supervisor_ticks_ms is ALREADY a small int, so passing it to
MP_OBJ_SMALL_INT again messes things up. I don't know why this passed
muster with the C type system, but oh well.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Epler 2022-11-05 11:50:19 -05:00
parent ae2bbbb8e7
commit 9dc559bb90
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: D5BF15AB975AB4DE
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
extmod/moduasyncio.c
View File

@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t ticks(void) {
// shared-bindings/supervisor/__init__.c). We assume/require that // shared-bindings/supervisor/__init__.c). We assume/require that
// supervisor.ticks_ms is picked as the ticks implementation under // supervisor.ticks_ms is picked as the ticks implementation under
// CircuitPython for the Python-coded bits of asyncio. // CircuitPython for the Python-coded bits of asyncio.
#define ticks() MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(supervisor_ticks_ms()) #define ticks() supervisor_ticks_ms()
#endif #endif
STATIC mp_int_t ticks_diff(mp_obj_t t1_in, mp_obj_t t0_in) { STATIC mp_int_t ticks_diff(mp_obj_t t1_in, mp_obj_t t0_in) {