djsundog
/
circuitpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

py/modsys: Use MP_SMALL_INT_MAX for sys.maxsize in case of LONGINT_IMPL_NONE. 

INT_MAX used previosly is indeed max value for int, whereas on LP64
platforms, long is used for mp_int_t. Using MP_SMALL_INT_MAX is the
correct way to do it anyway.
This commit is contained in:
Paul Sokolovsky 2017-03-06 12:15:25 +01:00
parent 914648ce0e
commit 96aa3a3102
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
py/modsys.c
View File

@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "py/objstr.h"
#include "py/objint.h"
#include "py/stream.h"
#include "py/smallint.h"
#if MICROPY_PY_SYS
@ -162,12 +163,12 @@ STATIC const mp_rom_map_elem_t mp_module_sys_globals_table[] = {
#if MICROPY_PY_SYS_MAXSIZE
#if MICROPY_LONGINT_IMPL == MICROPY_LONGINT_IMPL_NONE
// INT_MAX is not representable as small int, as we know that small int
// takes one bit for tag. So, we have little choice but to provide this
// value. Apps also should be careful to not try to compare sys.maxsize
// with some number (which may not fit in available int size), but instead
// count number of significant bits in sys.maxsize.
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_maxsize), MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(INT_MAX >> 1) },
// Maximum mp_int_t value is not representable as small int, so we have
// little choice but to use MP_SMALL_INT_MAX. Apps also should be careful
// to not try to compare sys.maxsize to some literal number (as this
// number might not fit in available int size), but instead count number
// of "one" bits in sys.maxsize.
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_maxsize), MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(MP_SMALL_INT_MAX) },
#else
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_maxsize), MP_ROM_PTR(&mp_maxsize_obj) },
#endif