djsundog
/
circuitpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

lexer, vstr: Add unicode support.

This commit is contained in:
Chris Angelico 2014-06-04 05:28:12 +10:00 committed by Paul Sokolovsky
parent 1e3781bc35
commit 2ba2299d28
2 changed files with 57 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
py/lexer.c
View File

@ -502,19 +502,32 @@ STATIC void mp_lexer_next_token_into(mp_lexer_t *lex, mp_token_t *tok, bool firs
case 'v': c = 0x0b; break;
case 'f': c = 0x0c; break;
case 'r': c = 0x0d; break;
case 'u':
case 'U':
if (is_bytes) {
// b'\u1234' == b'\\u1234'
vstr_add_char(&lex->vstr, '\\');
break;
}
// Otherwise fall through.
case 'x':
{
uint num = 0;
if (!get_hex(lex, 2, &num)) {
if (!get_hex(lex, (c == 'x' ? 2 : c == 'u' ? 4 : 8), &num)) {
// TODO error message
assert(0);
}
c = num;
break;
}
case 'N': break; // TODO \N{name} only in strings
case 'u': break; // TODO \uxxxx only in strings
case 'U': break; // TODO \Uxxxxxxxx only in strings
case 'N':
// Supporting '\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}' == 'a' would require keeping the
// entire Unicode name table in the core. As of Unicode 6.3.0, that's nearly
// 3MB of text; even gzip-compressed and with minimal structure, it'll take
// roughly half a meg of storage. This form of Unicode escape may be added
// later on, but it's definitely not a priority right now. -- CJA 20140607
assert(!"Unicode name escapes not supported");
break;
default:
if (c >= '0' && c <= '7') {
// Octal sequence, 1-3 chars
@ -533,7 +546,13 @@ STATIC void mp_lexer_next_token_into(mp_lexer_t *lex, mp_token_t *tok, bool firs
}
}
if (c != MP_LEXER_CHAR_EOF) {
vstr_add_char(&lex->vstr, c);
if (c < 0x110000 && !is_bytes) {
vstr_add_char(&lex->vstr, c);
} else if (c < 0x100 && is_bytes) {
vstr_add_byte(&lex->vstr, c);
} else {
assert(!"TODO: Throw an error, invalid escape code probably");
}
}
} else {
vstr_add_char(&lex->vstr, CUR_CHAR(lex));

38
py/vstr.c
View File

@ -199,12 +199,40 @@ void vstr_add_byte(vstr_t *vstr, byte b) {
}
void vstr_add_char(vstr_t *vstr, unichar c) {
// TODO UNICODE
byte *buf = (byte*)vstr_add_len(vstr, 1);
if (buf == NULL) {
return;
// TODO: Can this be simplified and deduplicated?
// Is it worth just calling vstr_add_len(vstr, 4)?
if (c < 0x80) {
byte *buf = (byte*)vstr_add_len(vstr, 1);
if (buf == NULL) {
return;
}
*buf = (byte)c;
} else if (c < 0x800) {
byte *buf = (byte*)vstr_add_len(vstr, 2);
if (buf == NULL) {
return;
}
buf[0] = (c >> 6) | 0xC0;
buf[1] = (c & 0x3F) | 0x80;
} else if (c < 0x10000) {
byte *buf = (byte*)vstr_add_len(vstr, 3);
if (buf == NULL) {
return;
}
buf[0] = (c >> 12) | 0xE0;
buf[1] = ((c >> 6) & 0x3F) | 0x80;
buf[2] = (c & 0x3F) | 0x80;
} else {
assert(c < 0x110000);
byte *buf = (byte*)vstr_add_len(vstr, 4);
if (buf == NULL) {
return;
}
buf[0] = (c >> 18) | 0xF0;
buf[1] = ((c >> 12) & 0x3F) | 0x80;
buf[2] = ((c >> 6) & 0x3F) | 0x80;
buf[3] = (c & 0x3F) | 0x80;
}
buf[0] = c;
}
void vstr_add_str(vstr_t *vstr, const char *str) {