circuitpython/tests/internal_bench/var-2-global.py

import bench

ITERS = 20000000


def test(num):
    i = 0
    while i < ITERS:
        i += 1


bench.run(test)
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`import bench`

			`ITERS = 20000000`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 19:27:36 +05:30
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`def test(num):`
			`i = 0`
			`while i < ITERS:`
			`i += 1`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 19:27:36 +05:30
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`bench.run(test)`