circuitpython/tests/internal_bench/loop_count-1-range.py

import bench


def test(num):
    for i in range(num):
        pass


bench.run(test)
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`import bench`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 19:27:36 +05:30
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`def test(num):`
			`for i in range(num):`
			`pass`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 19:27:36 +05:30
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-05 01:24:16 +03:00			`bench.run(test)`