djsundog
/
circuitpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
circuitpython/ports/atmel-samd/common-hal/microcontroller/__init__.c

260 lines
7.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
/*
* This file is part of the MicroPython project, http://micropython.org/
*
* The MIT License (MIT)
*
* Copyright (c) 2016 Scott Shawcroft for Adafruit Industries
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
* of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
* in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
* to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
* copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
* furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
* all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
* AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
* THE SOFTWARE.
*/
#include "py/mphal.h"
atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. (#203) * atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. This allows for persisting small configuration values even when the file system is read-only from CircuitPython. Fixes #160 * Review feedback: * Add tests. * Fix non-zero index. * Fix len()
2017-08-25 16:00:27 -04:00
#include "py/obj.h"
Move to ASF4 and introduce SAMD51 support. (#258) * atmel-samd: Remove ASF3. This will break builds. * atmel-samd: Add ASF4 for the SAMD21 and SAMD51. * Introduce the supervisor concept to facilitate porting. The supervisor is the code which runs individual MicroPython VMs. By splitting it out we make it more consistent and easier to find. This also adds very basic SAMD21 and SAMD51 support using the supervisor. Only the REPL currently works. This begins the work for #178.
2017-09-22 21:05:51 -04:00
#include "hal/include/hal_atomic.h"
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
#include "py/runtime.h"
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
#include "reset.h"
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#include "samd21_pins.h"
atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. (#203) * atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. This allows for persisting small configuration values even when the file system is read-only from CircuitPython. Fixes #160 * Review feedback: * Add tests. * Fix non-zero index. * Fix len()
2017-08-25 16:00:27 -04:00
#include "shared-bindings/nvm/ByteArray.h"
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
#include "shared-bindings/microcontroller/__init__.h"
Add microcontroller.cpu.temperature, for use as a simple sensor on minimal boards. (#211) * Add microcontroller.cpu, the sole instance of microcontroller.Processor. microcontroller.cpu.frequency is the clock frequency, in Hz. microcontroller.cpu.temperature is the reading from the internal temperature sensor, in Celsius. None if not available. * Squeeze firmware size by using -finline-limit. Otherwise non-Express builds were slightly too big. * Update submodules. * Fix documentation glitches
2017-08-31 13:48:30 -04:00
#include "shared-bindings/microcontroller/Processor.h"
atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. (#203) * atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. This allows for persisting small configuration values even when the file system is read-only from CircuitPython. Fixes #160 * Review feedback: * Add tests. * Fix non-zero index. * Fix len()
2017-08-25 16:00:27 -04:00
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
void common_hal_mcu_delay_us(uint32_t delay) {
mp_hal_delay_us(delay);
}
Add try_lock and unlock to I2C and SPI classes to make sure things are shared well between threads and underlying MicroPython (SPI Flash for example.) It is recommended to use the bus device classes to manage the locks and other transaction state. https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_MicroPython_BusDevice Fixed #58 Fixed #59 Fixed #60
2016-11-30 18:08:34 -05:00
// Interrupt flags that will be saved and restored during disable/Enable
// interrupt functions below.
Move to ASF4 and introduce SAMD51 support. (#258) * atmel-samd: Remove ASF3. This will break builds. * atmel-samd: Add ASF4 for the SAMD21 and SAMD51. * Introduce the supervisor concept to facilitate porting. The supervisor is the code which runs individual MicroPython VMs. By splitting it out we make it more consistent and easier to find. This also adds very basic SAMD21 and SAMD51 support using the supervisor. Only the REPL currently works. This begins the work for #178.
2017-09-22 21:05:51 -04:00
volatile hal_atomic_t flags;
Add try_lock and unlock to I2C and SPI classes to make sure things are shared well between threads and underlying MicroPython (SPI Flash for example.) It is recommended to use the bus device classes to manage the locks and other transaction state. https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_MicroPython_BusDevice Fixed #58 Fixed #59 Fixed #60
2016-11-30 18:08:34 -05:00
void common_hal_mcu_disable_interrupts(void) {
Move to ASF4 and introduce SAMD51 support. (#258) * atmel-samd: Remove ASF3. This will break builds. * atmel-samd: Add ASF4 for the SAMD21 and SAMD51. * Introduce the supervisor concept to facilitate porting. The supervisor is the code which runs individual MicroPython VMs. By splitting it out we make it more consistent and easier to find. This also adds very basic SAMD21 and SAMD51 support using the supervisor. Only the REPL currently works. This begins the work for #178.
2017-09-22 21:05:51 -04:00
atomic_enter_critical(&flags);
Add try_lock and unlock to I2C and SPI classes to make sure things are shared well between threads and underlying MicroPython (SPI Flash for example.) It is recommended to use the bus device classes to manage the locks and other transaction state. https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_MicroPython_BusDevice Fixed #58 Fixed #59 Fixed #60
2016-11-30 18:08:34 -05:00
}
void common_hal_mcu_enable_interrupts(void) {
Move to ASF4 and introduce SAMD51 support. (#258) * atmel-samd: Remove ASF3. This will break builds. * atmel-samd: Add ASF4 for the SAMD21 and SAMD51. * Introduce the supervisor concept to facilitate porting. The supervisor is the code which runs individual MicroPython VMs. By splitting it out we make it more consistent and easier to find. This also adds very basic SAMD21 and SAMD51 support using the supervisor. Only the REPL currently works. This begins the work for #178.
2017-09-22 21:05:51 -04:00
atomic_leave_critical(&flags);
Add try_lock and unlock to I2C and SPI classes to make sure things are shared well between threads and underlying MicroPython (SPI Flash for example.) It is recommended to use the bus device classes to manage the locks and other transaction state. https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_MicroPython_BusDevice Fixed #58 Fixed #59 Fixed #60
2016-11-30 18:08:34 -05:00
}
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
extern uint32_t _ezero;
void common_hal_mcu_on_next_reset(mcu_runmode_t runmode) {
// Set up the defaults.
atmel-samd: reset: reset() was always entering bootloader mode .. set the dbl_tap word to a different special value unless RUNMODE_BOOTLOADER was selected
2018-04-04 20:21:54 -04:00
_bootloader_dbl_tap = DBL_TAP_MAGIC_QUICK_BOOT;
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
_ezero = CIRCUITPY_CANARY_WORD;
if (runmode == RUNMODE_BOOTLOADER) {
if (!bootloader_available()) {
mp_raise_ValueError("Cannot reset into bootloader because no bootloader is present.");
}
// Pretend to be the first of the two reset presses needed to enter the
// bootloader. That way one reset will end in the bootloader.
_bootloader_dbl_tap = DBL_TAP_MAGIC;
} else if (runmode == RUNMODE_SAFE_MODE) {
_ezero = CIRCUITPY_SOFTWARE_SAFE_MODE;
}
}
void common_hal_mcu_reset(void) {
reset();
}
Add microcontroller.cpu.temperature, for use as a simple sensor on minimal boards. (#211) * Add microcontroller.cpu, the sole instance of microcontroller.Processor. microcontroller.cpu.frequency is the clock frequency, in Hz. microcontroller.cpu.temperature is the reading from the internal temperature sensor, in Celsius. None if not available. * Squeeze firmware size by using -finline-limit. Otherwise non-Express builds were slightly too big. * Update submodules. * Fix documentation glitches
2017-08-31 13:48:30 -04:00
// The singleton microcontroller.Processor object, bound to microcontroller.cpu
// It currently only has properties, and no state.
merge from 2.2.0 + fix up board defs
2018-01-02 21:25:41 -05:00
const mcu_processor_obj_t common_hal_mcu_processor_obj = {
Add microcontroller.cpu.temperature, for use as a simple sensor on minimal boards. (#211) * Add microcontroller.cpu, the sole instance of microcontroller.Processor. microcontroller.cpu.frequency is the clock frequency, in Hz. microcontroller.cpu.temperature is the reading from the internal temperature sensor, in Celsius. None if not available. * Squeeze firmware size by using -finline-limit. Otherwise non-Express builds were slightly too big. * Update submodules. * Fix documentation glitches
2017-08-31 13:48:30 -04:00
.base = {
.type = &mcu_processor_type,
},
};
atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. (#203) * atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. This allows for persisting small configuration values even when the file system is read-only from CircuitPython. Fixes #160 * Review feedback: * Add tests. * Fix non-zero index. * Fix len()
2017-08-25 16:00:27 -04:00
// NVM is only available on Express boards for now.
#if CIRCUITPY_INTERNAL_NVM_SIZE > 0
Add microcontroller.cpu.temperature, for use as a simple sensor on minimal boards. (#211) * Add microcontroller.cpu, the sole instance of microcontroller.Processor. microcontroller.cpu.frequency is the clock frequency, in Hz. microcontroller.cpu.temperature is the reading from the internal temperature sensor, in Celsius. None if not available. * Squeeze firmware size by using -finline-limit. Otherwise non-Express builds were slightly too big. * Update submodules. * Fix documentation glitches
2017-08-31 13:48:30 -04:00
// The singleton nvm.ByteArray object.
Turn on nvm in 3.0. Its 256b on M0 and 8k on M4 to match flash erase sizes. Fixes #758
2018-04-12 21:13:40 -04:00
const nvm_bytearray_obj_t common_hal_mcu_nvm_obj = {
.base = {
.type = &nvm_bytearray_type,
},
.len = CIRCUITPY_INTERNAL_NVM_SIZE,
.start_address = (uint8_t*) (FLASH_SIZE - CIRCUITPY_INTERNAL_NVM_SIZE)
};
atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. (#203) * atmel-samd: Introduce a nvm module for non-volatile byte-level memory access. This allows for persisting small configuration values even when the file system is read-only from CircuitPython. Fixes #160 * Review feedback: * Add tests. * Fix non-zero index. * Fix len()
2017-08-25 16:00:27 -04:00
#endif
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
// This maps MCU pin names to pin objects.
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
STATIC const mp_rom_map_elem_t mcu_pin_global_dict_table[] = {
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
// Pins in datasheet order.
#ifdef PIN_PA00
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA00), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA00) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA01
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA01), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA01) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA02
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA02), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA02) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA03
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA03), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA03) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB04
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB04), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB04) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB05
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB05), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB05) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB06
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB06), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB06) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB07
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB07), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB07) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB08
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB08), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB08) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB09
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB09), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB09) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA04
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA04), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA04) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA05
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA05), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA05) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA06
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA06), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA06) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA07
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA07), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA07) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA08
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA08), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA08) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA09
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA09), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA09) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA10
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA10), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA10) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA11
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA11), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA11) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB10
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB10), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB10) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB11
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB11), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB11) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB12
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB12), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB12) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB13
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB13), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB13) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB14
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB14), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB14) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
// Second page.
#ifdef PIN_PB15
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB15), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB15) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA12
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA12), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA12) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA13
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA13), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA13) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA14
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA14), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA14) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA15
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA15), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA15) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA16
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA16), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA16) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA17
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA17), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA17) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA18
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA18), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA18) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA19
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA19), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA19) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB16
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB16), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB16) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB17
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB17), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB17) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA20
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA20), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA20) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA21
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA21), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA21) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA22
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA22), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA22) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA23
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA23), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA23) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA24
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA24), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA24) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA25
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA25), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA25) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB22
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB22), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB22) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB23
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB23), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB23) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA27
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA27), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA27) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA28
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA28), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA28) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA30
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA30), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA30) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PA31
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PA31), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PA31) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB30
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB30), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB30) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB31
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB31), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB31) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB00
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB00), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB00) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB01
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB01), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB01) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB02
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB02), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB02) },
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
#ifdef PIN_PB03
Modernize module and class static dicts; update freetouch
2017-08-27 15:02:50 -04:00
{ MP_ROM_QSTR(MP_QSTR_PB03), MP_ROM_PTR(&pin_PB03) }
This introduces an alternative hardware API called nativeio structured around different functions that are typically accelerated by native hardware. Its not meant to reflect the structure of the hardware. Docs are here: http://tannewt-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/microcontroller/ It differs from upstream's machine in the following ways: * Python API is identical across ports due to code structure. (Lives in shared-bindings) * Focuses on abstracting common functionality (AnalogIn) and not representing structure (ADC). * Documentation lives with code making it easy to ensure they match. * Pin is split into references (board.D13 and microcontroller.pin.PA17) and functionality (DigitalInOut). * All nativeio classes claim underlying hardware resources when inited on construction, support Context Managers (aka with statements) and have deinit methods which release the claimed hardware. * All constructors take pin references rather than peripheral ids. Its up to the implementation to find hardware or throw and exception.
2016-11-03 18:50:59 -04:00
#endif
};
MP_DEFINE_CONST_DICT(mcu_pin_globals, mcu_pin_global_dict_table);