circuitpython/tests/internal_bench/loop_count-2-range_iter.py

import bench


def test(num):
    for i in iter(range(num)):
        pass


bench.run(test)
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-04 18:24:16 -04:00			`import bench`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 09:57:36 -04:00
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-04 18:24:16 -04:00			`def test(num):`
			`for i in iter(range(num)):`
			`pass`

run code formatting script 2021-03-15 09:57:36 -04:00
tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking. Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython. More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77 Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more bytecodes, the slower the code. 2014-05-04 18:24:16 -04:00			`bench.run(test)`